It's been chatter in the Languedoc: The Post's reaction to the Aude in the wake of the flight envelope daily recommended a letter carrier from Carcassonne during his tour of 20 December 2010.
What is normal: the postal operator has filed a complaint and the accused recipients.
What unworthy in urban conversations: it is addressed to guess who could send them a letter or an e followed ... Sounds easy if you wait for a command, at least if it is a contract or an unexpected emergency bill.
The article states that, of course, shippers will be contacted (thank you barcodes and tracking), but later on, certainly, a special procedure to protect the private information of corrrespondance: all employees The Post did not know where comes from and where all correspondence will go to them under the nose.
Nevertheless, in order to inform the recipients and the reaction of colleagues to discover the crime, it seems that the gap between the post and recipients remain wide despite the new leitmotif bandedessiné : Complain!
Why should it be otherwise when the contract is binding postal operator to sender ? Even as the recipient also undergoes the inconvenience of postal errors. Recent complaints from lawyers ( Caen, Marseille ) may end up one day impose a new law more favorable to the recipient. The
Post win, in my humble opinion, to take the lead before a late or lost mail from a sender creates a recipient earned a strong competitor. Should we wish the price war with implantation of TNT and DHL on the Daily Mail of the French?
0 comments:
Post a Comment